Showing posts with label language. Show all posts
Showing posts with label language. Show all posts

Friday, September 2, 2011

Metaphors and Onions


I began by reading an article on autobiography by James Olney entitled Metaphors of Self. One of the elements in his analysis of autobiography is a “duplex metaphor” which essentially is the author analyzing himself at a previous point in his life when he was analyzing himself. (Olney is much more graceful in his language. I like calling it a meta-metaphor) I have several examples of this in readings for class, but I am trying to get the idea into my head concretely enough to write about it. This of course involves me thinking about other examples and trying to find a common thread to follow.

Unfortunately, my threads are not at all logical. You might say that my train of thought has no tracks. I came up with one example from The Onion. It was an article about a new game that is available in which you play a character who is playing a massive online multiplayer game: World of World of Warcraft. If you want to see the report click here: http://www.theonion.com/video/warcraft-sequel-lets-gamers-play-a-character-playi,14240/

At any rate I brought this random association up with Jeff, asked for some more reasonable examples, and he offered some suggestions. Here is a sample of how my brain functions (or doesn’t).

Me: I read about autobiography theory and the critic speaks about metaphor simplex (just a basic metaphor) and duplex (kind of a meta - metaphor. It is analyzing yourself analyzing yourself.) I am trying to put that into words and context that make sense to me
Unfortunately all I have come up with the the Onion Article about playing World of World of Warcraft.

Jeff: Meta thinking is simply thinking about how you think. When I talk to families about hidden family dynamics, I raise their awareness about unspoken rules and help them think about how they think as a family and how it affects their behavior. (He’s a therapist.)

Me: Yes I know. But I think there is an error in my positronic nets which does not allow me to make reasonable and valid associations. Maybe I should stop reading the Onion . . .

Jeff: Catcher in the Rye is a good example, because Holden is on a trip where he learns about himself and even thinks about himself and his behavior. The self-analysis of a character of a story, who is also subject to analysis would be a good example, I think.

Perhaps the movie, Being John Malkovich would be a good example of duplex metaphor.

Me: I have several examples from the reading that we have done, and I even like the concept. I just seem to only be able to think up to a point and then I hit my head into the same story or idea over and over without moving deeper into the layers of the concept. Of course an onion has layers . . .

Jeff: So do ogres.

Me: Great. Now I want a parfait.

Jeff: Everybody likes a parfait.
How about Groundhog Day?
In a sense, Murray's character has to analyze his performance from the day before in order to change himself...

Me: Now I'm thinking about sailing. . .

Jeff: Random . . .

For those of you who don’t follow my very tenuous leaps of logic that last one is from “What about Bob?”

Someone please tell me that I can turn my brain back on so that I can make actual literary associations.

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Similie, Internet and food

Mary Hannah (10) takes after me in many ways. One particular way is her love of language. She enjoys wordplay and making odd comparisons. Last night she was complaining about how slow our wireless is at home.
She said, "Matt's internet is like drinking a glass of water. Leah's internet is like swallowing a pill that gets stuck but eventually goes on down. Our internet is like chewing a really fatty piece of meat. It's not going anywhere."

Where does she come up with this stuff?

Am